Commercial Real Estate
News and Insights

New dynamics in corporate real estate outsourcing require new thinking from corporate real estate executives

By Avison Young Contributor

  • Large global service providers should no longer be perceived as exclusively safe or the easy default choice
  • Behavioural-based qualities like commitment, team chemistry and trust are now known to be vitally important to the success of corporate real estate outsourcing with a service provider
  • Technology is important, but it is no panacea or replacement for trust
  • Smart corporate real estate executives now cast a wider net when seeking corporate real estate outsourcing service provider partners
The decision-making process for corporate real estate outsourcing has become increasingly dynamic. The drivers that frequently tipped the scale in favour of the largest global service providers with their expensive proprietary technology are no longer as compelling given the rise in importance of behaviour-based qualities of service providers, including trust. Smart industry leaders should keep an open mind to both large and medium-sized service providers when evaluating outsourcing candidates.

These are some of the key trends noted in my white paper “Shifting Gears: Corporate OccupantsRe-evaluate Real Estate Outsourcing Models”.

Outsourcing drivers are changing among heads of corporate real estate for occupants, especially those with smaller or medium-sized portfolios. Their companies often do not need fully integrated, global services. These leaders now have more choices and are more open to working with smaller- and medium-sized firms that do not necessarily position themselves as full-service global corporate real estate providers.

It all begins with trust. Trust in an outsourcing relationship is more important than what both parties negotiate into the service agreement. Trust is a key element to the long-term success of the relationship. Trust is causal – that is, a direct link exists between trust and longevity in outsourcing relationships.

Some industry watchers are even now wondering whether larger service providers have lost the ability to move quickly, think entrepreneurially or take reasonable risks. The conventional wisdom is that a broker-led model, which supposedly casts aside the breadth of non-brokerage ancillary services, is somehow lacking when compared with a corporate services-led brokerage approach. More recently, some corporate real estate leaders have reversed course from a traditional corporate-services model to a broker-led one. The new broker-led service providers are not burdened by the overhead of typical large full-service brokerage firms.

For years, the default corporate option was to favour the largest global service providers, most of which rely heavily on expensive proprietary technology as a way to smooth over any gaps in integrated service delivery. Increasingly, corporate real estate executives are realizing that the behaviour-based qualities of service providers like commitment, team chemistry and trust are just as important – or even more important – than sheer scale or technology to the overall success of the joint relationship.

As a result, pragmatic corporate real estate leaders include both traditional large and medium-sized service-provider firms when contemplating outsourcing candidates. The results achieved for satisfied clients by many of these nimble mid-sized firms are simply too compelling to ignore.